Showing posts with label Straight No Chaser. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Straight No Chaser. Show all posts

19 March 2016

STRAIGHT, NO CHASER: RACISM AND REPARATIONS

By Patrice Lockert-Anthony


I do not want simple economic reparations (in any amount) for Black Americans. I do believe that White America owes Black America. I do not believe that what has been done thus far through conscience, and/or legislation, in any way, makes up for what has been done throughout history, or is being done now. I think that the vast majority of White America, when it comes to Black America, are irresponsible, and cannot think its way out of a paper bag when it comes to race-based issues. There is entirely too much "lack” for that to happen. There is a lack of consciousness. There is a lack of accountability. There is a lack of culpability. There is a lack of desire. There is a lack of will. While these things are true; White America cannot apply critical reasoning to the problem at hand (their problem made mine).

Here is the two-fold problem around economic reparations for Black America:

One: There is no amount of money in this very wealthy nation (or the world), that would serve as anything more than a very tiny band-aid trying to cover the gaping wound that is racial hatred and treatment of blacks in America. That is obvious to me, and I daresay to many others. Hundreds of years of slavery, decades of Jim Crow, followed by many, too many, decades (into the present) of pernicious policies, rules of behavior, and acculturation to wrong-thinking and wrong doing by both civil society and the official types who are paid to serve, protect, care for, educate, govern, etc., all of America’s citizens.

Two: and perhaps less obvious is that White Americans have, all along, sought ways in which to avoid having to face the egregious nature of their wrong doings. They have also, in many ways, and many times, sought to apply the band aid rather than seek, and work for, the cure to this deadly disease of racism. If then, knowing that, we gave them the out of paying economic reparations . . . what then? Do we believe that the psychology of the racist would somehow magically dissipate? Do we believe that having paid us off; suddenly White America would climb onto the heretofore assiduously avoided bandwagon, to talk about, work through, and heal, the diseased rift of consciousness, that ripping our ancestors from the Motherland and enslaving them, put into play? I have no confidence in such a belief.

Once the monies have been paid out; I believe the conversation will be shut down and whenever cries of “that’s unfair” or “that’s racist” rend the air, the response will be a categorical, “No. No, we’ve paid that debt. We’ve given you the economic means to pull up on the bootstraps. It’s on you now. You can’t blame us anymore.”

That is where all these current arguments are coming from about how it’s all about “class” issues. As if the only reason black Americans are in prison in gargantuan disproportionate numbers, engaging in destructive behaviors, being beat down by bad cops, getting politically tricked out of voting, dying in ways that are far beyond suspicious, etc., is only because we lack the economic means to access success.

Do any of my readers, of whatever makeup, actually believe that nonsense? Remember this. There is always a "Why?”. There is always a, "HOW?”. You must ask yourselves what happened (within the specific construct of race relations in America) to create the economic disparities? When that question is answered honestly; you will understand why approaching the issue as purely economic (class-based) is erroneous and disingenuous.

Black America isn’t less achieving because of class-based issues. Black America is "behind” because of racial intent, race-based planning, and race-based design. It is what it is because of an accrual of damage (psychic, emotional, educational, legal, civil, etc.). Our presidents were involved.

Our Supreme Court judges were involved. Our senators and representatives were involved. Our business communities were involved. Our medical professionals were involved. Our military was involved. For hundreds of years continuing into the present day the cultural, and often legislated, law of the land was to have Black Americans legitimized as lesser human beings and lesser citizens. To behave as if that isn’t so is to, at the very least, behave stupidly. Somewhere in the middle it is to be behave as ignorantly irresponsible. At the very worst, to deny it is to be somehow less than human (somewhere below three-fifths).

In faith~




Patrice Lockert Anthony

THE DECOLONIZER
February 2016

Read the full newsletter here »

22 December 2015

STRAIGHT, NO CHASER

Good Cop > Bad Cop


by Patrice Lockert Anthony


The Big Easy (Image source: morefilms.de)

In 1987 Columbia Pictures released a Jim McBride film called, The Big Easy. The screenplay was written by Daniel Petrie, Jr, and starred Dennis Quaid (Detective Lt. Remy McSwain) and Ellen Barkin (A.D.A. Anne Osbourne). It was filmed on location in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Remy McSwain sees himself as an honest cop. He arrests the bad guys. He serves the community. He also, with the participation of other cops on the squad, helps himself to monies from the “widows and orphans” fund. This is okay for him because he uses it to pay for his kid brother’s college tuition.

After he’s caught (on tape) accepting a bribe for protection; he is exonerated after some of his fellow cops arrange to magnetically erase the evidence being held in the evidence room. He’s happy about the outcome.

Remy doesn’t think any better because this is how it’s always been. His father, and other relatives before him, now, and probably future generations of McSwains would have been "innocently” on the take if not for a state assistant district attorney.

Enter Anne Osbourne. There’s some powerful chemistry here. They feel the tug of attraction, but Ms. Osbourne is there to expose corrupt cops. Cops on the take. Cops who murder. She’s after bad cops. She wants them gone (investigated, charged, and doing time). Problem. The "good” cops aren’t helping her do her job.

Unfortunately for their mutual attraction; Anne is the prosecutor when Remy is caught with his hand in the cookie jar. She is dismayed on account of the attraction, but also certain of the conviction. She has an eye witness, and the tape. Too bad that’s not enough.

After the trial, Remy’s family throws a party for him. Everyone is celebrating. Remy has his uncle (a cop) all but kidnap Anne to bring her to the party. Remy hasn’t figured out yet that Anne isn’t amused.  She informs him, “You still don’t get it, do you? Why don't you just face it, Remy; you’re not one of the good guys anymore?”

Why am I sharing this movie plot with you, my readers? It’s because there is a larger lesson to be learned . . . by real life cops. Precincts are tight places. Everybody knows other folks’ business. This is true because in a precinct, you are your brother’s (and sister’s) keeper. Cops have to support each other. They need to know they have each other’s backs. When that support spreads to knowing who’s corrupt, however, who’s racist (and commits racist acts, or any of the other isms), who bullies, and bashes, who uses excessive force; it is no longer having your fellow cop’s back. It is corruption. When a cop fails to come forward, or find some way of shining a light on what is wrong in the ranks; that cop becomes complicit in any wrongdoing, any crime committed. A cop who knows, yet fails to shine that light is also guilty.

Cops everywhere hate it when people (witnesses) refuse to come forward. It makes their job more difficult and feeds into a frustration that makes it all but impossible to serve the community well.

Community members who witness crimes should, in whatever way possible, endeavor to shine a light on the problem and help the police solve the crime, and help make the community a safer place.

This is just as true, if not more so, for cops. Cops carry guns, mace, sticks, and the badge of authority to bend people to their will. That means the members of the community have to place their trust in them to do what’s right.

Too often that trust is violated. And every time it is violated; it is because someone on the force knew better, or at least suspected, and yet refused to shine the light. Edmund Burke said that, “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” We don’t need any more facile explanations, or defensive posturing. No more ignoring the problem, or dismissing the painfully obvious. No more deflecting. No more lying. If you’re not participating in the solution . . . if you refuse to shine a light on what is wrong at the precinct . . . if you are still in lock-step with allowing the corruption, and enjoying the privilege and power of the badge, well . . . “Why don’t you just face it . . . you’re not one of the good guys anymore?”


In faith~





Patrice Lockert Anthony

THE DECOLONIZER
December 2015

Read the full newsletter here »

16 November 2015

STRAIGHT, NO CHASER: THE CRUCIBLE OF BLACK LIVES MATTER

by Patrice Lockert Anthony


I doubt not God is good, well-meaning, kind,
And did He stoop to quibble could tell why
The little buried mole continues blind,
Why flesh that mirrors Him must someday die,
Make plain the reason tortured Tantalus
Is baited by the fickle fruit, declare
If merely brute caprice dooms Sisyphus
To struggle up a never-ending stair.
Inscrutable His ways are, and immune
To catechism by a mind too strewn
With petty cares to slightly understand
What awful brain compels His awful hand.
Yet do I marvel at this curious thing:
To make a poet black, and bid him sing! 
"Yet I Do Marvel" by Countee Cullen (1925)

The Black Lives Matter movement has met with a number of assaults. None of which is more curious to me, or more pernicious by nature, than the "go to" charge of "all lives matter" as a counter response. The "all lives matter" movement, within the context of its response to the "Black Lives Matter" movement is a subversive counterpoint to the inconvenience of truth telling. It is inconvenient to spend time, money, thought, energy, et cetera on the meanings and truths behind the egregious loss of black lives in a nation that refuses to hold itself accountable at individual, organizational, or societal levels.

This is what's at the heart of Countee Cullen's poem, "Yet I Do Marvel." To be pressed at the level of faith/belief in something that you've fought for, died for, celebrated, defended, and then to be left to wonder how that thing which you so honor could set you up for such unconscionable, unbearable pain of heart wrenching, soul destroying bias. It is a conundrum, to be sure, to live in a country which makes such full use of your sweat, imagination, and brilliance, only to turn around and beat you up, and down, with a foot on necks while refusing to acknowledge self-evident truths.


1 October 2015

STRAIGHT, NO CHASER: MISSISSIPPI GD

by Patrice Lockert Anthony


"Straight, No Chaser," is a monthly column, based in large part, on James Baldwin's contention (which he wrote of in "The Fire Next Time") that part of the evolution and revolution around race issues in America will be African Americans acting as white America's mirror. My column will address race issues in America both specifically, and comparatively (race issues around the world).

While I care about, and will address, myriad race issues, I will, more often than not, examine issues between whites and blacks in America. White European racial aggression and oppression may not have begun with black folk in America, but it is, arguably, the most historically, legally, and subtextually defined relationship with regard to that bugaboo called, "Race in America."